AML-KYC Casework
Financial-services AML/KYC casework with a confidential-gated learnings domain — demonstrate the workspace-KB learnings exchange in a regulated financial context.
The AML-KYC Casework pack demonstrates the org-KB learnings exchange in a regulated financial-services context. Casework teams capture investigation notes in a workspace knowledgebase; on finalization, the platform condenses them into typed AmlLearning records — red flags, controls, and severity ratings — that land in a confidential-gated, immutable org domain requiring a two-reviewer quorum before materialization.
What the pack provisions
| What | Detail |
|---|---|
AmlLearning object type | Properties: title (string), redFlag (text), control (text), severity (string: low / medium / high / critical) |
aml_learnings governed domain | confidential classification cap, org:mlro role required, immutable rows (no post-promotion edits), 2-reviewer approval quorum |
| "AML Case Review" process flow | Final stage approval action with promoteToOrgKb: true; knowledge.promotionTarget → aml_learnings / AmlLearning |
Installing the pack provisions both the governed aml_learnings domain and the AML Case Review process flow. Starting a template instance auto-creates a workspace KB linked to aml_learnings. The full case-investigation-to-org-corpus journey works from the download.
Download
- aml-kyc-casework.scrydon-pack.tar.gz — latest.
- scrydon-pack-aml-kyc-casework-1.0.0.scrydon-pack.tar.gz — version-pinned.
Install
aml-kyc-casework.scrydon-pack.tar.gz, and click Upload. The AmlLearning object type and the org-scoped aml_learnings domain are provisioned immediately, and the AML Case Review process flow is made available org-wide.aml_learnings / AmlLearning — no manual KB wiring needed.Learnings flow
The finalize trigger is the standard org-KB pattern — either an approval action with promoteToOrgKb: true on process completion, or the Workspace-Admin Promote learnings button.
AmlLearning records.severity, redFlag, control, and title are shaped to the AmlLearning property schema resolved from the ontology. Each record carries references back to the source case pages.aml_learnings domain requires a 2-reviewer quorum — two members with the org:mlro role must independently approve before a learning materializes.aml_learnings as immutable rows. No post-promotion edits are possible.Immutability is enforced at the domain level. Once an AmlLearning materializes, it cannot be edited. To correct a materialized learning, revoke it (which creates an audit entry) and promote the corrected version through the full quorum review.
Governance at a glance
| Policy | Setting |
|---|---|
| Classification cap | confidential |
| Required role | org:mlro (Money Laundering Reporting Officer) |
| Review gate | 2-reviewer approval quorum |
| Immutability | Rows cannot be edited post-materialization |
| Re-finalize behavior | Upsert by stable learning key — quorum triggered only for new or changed content |
confidential means only MLRO-role members see these rows. Members without org:mlro cannot read aml_learnings content even via Analytics or the Cortex agent — the classification cap is enforced at retrieval, not just at display.
What's interesting about it
- Two-reviewer quorum. No single person can approve a financial-crime learning into the org corpus — the quorum gate requires two independent
org:mlrosign-offs. - Immutable provenance. Each AmlLearning's signed provenance record is permanent and cannot be altered after materialization, satisfying audit trail requirements.
confidentialclassification cap. Any properties that exceedconfidential— for example,nomineeDetailsin a SAR — are automatically masked for members below that clearance.- References link to case pages. Each learning's
referencesfield lists the exact workspace KB pages that contributed to it, so auditors can trace a control or red flag back to the underlying case material.
Related
- Promoting content — broker client reference and both finalize paths.
- Markings & governed retrieval — how classification caps are enforced at retrieval.
- FOIA Precedent example — government vertical with records retention and PII redaction.